Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Introduce ID register specific descriptor
From: Jing Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-27 03:06:22
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
Hi Reiji, On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 8:00 PM Reiji Watanabe [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Jing, On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 1:58 PM Jing Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Introduce an ID feature register specific descriptor to include ID register specific fields and callbacks besides its corresponding general system register descriptor. New fields for ID register descriptor would be added later when it is necessary to support a writable ID register. No functional change intended. Co-developed-by: Reiji Watanabe <redacted> Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <redacted> --- arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c index 14ae03a1d8d0..15d0338742b6 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ #include "sys_regs.h" +struct id_reg_desc { + const struct sys_reg_desc reg_desc; +}; + static u8 vcpu_pmuver(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu))@@ -329,21 +333,25 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, } /* sys_reg_desc initialiser for known cpufeature ID registers */ -#define ID_SANITISED(name) { \ - SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \ - .access = access_id_reg, \ - .get_user = get_id_reg, \ - .set_user = set_id_reg, \ - .visibility = id_visibility, \ +#define ID_SANITISED(name) { \ + .reg_desc = { \ + SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \ + .access = access_id_reg, \ + .get_user = get_id_reg, \ + .set_user = set_id_reg, \ + .visibility = id_visibility, \ + }, \ } /* sys_reg_desc initialiser for known cpufeature ID registers */ -#define AA32_ID_SANITISED(name) { \ - SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \ - .access = access_id_reg, \ - .get_user = get_id_reg, \ - .set_user = set_id_reg, \ - .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, \ +#define AA32_ID_SANITISED(name) { \ + .reg_desc = { \ + SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \ + .access = access_id_reg, \ + .get_user = get_id_reg, \ + .set_user = set_id_reg, \ + .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, \ + }, \ } /*@@ -351,12 +359,14 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, * register with encoding Op0=3, Op1=0, CRn=0, CRm=crm, Op2=op2 * (1 <= crm < 8, 0 <= Op2 < 8). */ -#define ID_UNALLOCATED(crm, op2) { \ - Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(0), CRm(crm), Op2(op2), \ - .access = access_id_reg, \ - .get_user = get_id_reg, \ - .set_user = set_id_reg, \ - .visibility = raz_visibility \ +#define ID_UNALLOCATED(crm, op2) { \ + .reg_desc = { \ + Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(0), CRm(crm), Op2(op2), \ + .access = access_id_reg, \ + .get_user = get_id_reg, \ + .set_user = set_id_reg, \ + .visibility = raz_visibility \ + }, \ } /*@@ -364,15 +374,17 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, * For now, these are exposed just like unallocated ID regs: they appear * RAZ for the guest. */ -#define ID_HIDDEN(name) { \ - SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \ - .access = access_id_reg, \ - .get_user = get_id_reg, \ - .set_user = set_id_reg, \ - .visibility = raz_visibility, \ +#define ID_HIDDEN(name) { \ + .reg_desc = { \ + SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \ + .access = access_id_reg, \ + .get_user = get_id_reg, \ + .set_user = set_id_reg, \ + .visibility = raz_visibility, \ + }, \ } -static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = { +static const struct id_reg_desc id_reg_descs[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_NUM] = { /* * ID regs: all ID_SANITISED() entries here must have corresponding * entries in arm64_ftr_regs[].@@ -382,9 +394,13 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = { /* CRm=1 */ AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR0_EL1), AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR1_EL1), - { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg, - .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_dfr0_el1, - .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, }, + { .reg_desc = { + SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1), + .access = access_id_reg, + .get_user = get_id_reg, + .set_user = set_id_dfr0_el1, + .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, }, + }, ID_HIDDEN(ID_AFR0_EL1), AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR0_EL1), AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR1_EL1),@@ -413,8 +429,12 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = { /* AArch64 ID registers */ /* CRm=4 */ - { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg, - .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_aa64pfr0_el1, }, + { .reg_desc = { + SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), + .access = access_id_reg, + .get_user = get_id_reg, + .set_user = set_id_aa64pfr0_el1, }, + }, ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1), ID_UNALLOCATED(4, 2), ID_UNALLOCATED(4, 3),@@ -424,8 +444,12 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = { ID_UNALLOCATED(4, 7), /* CRm=5 */ - { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg, - .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_aa64dfr0_el1, }, + { .reg_desc = { + SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), + .access = access_id_reg, + .get_user = get_id_reg, + .set_user = set_id_aa64dfr0_el1, }, + }, ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1), ID_UNALLOCATED(5, 2), ID_UNALLOCATED(5, 3),@@ -457,7 +481,13 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = { const struct sys_reg_desc *kvm_arm_find_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_params *params) { - return find_reg(params, id_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs)); + u32 id; + + id = reg_to_encoding(params); + if (!is_id_reg(id)) + return NULL; + + return &id_reg_descs[IDREG_IDX(id)].reg_desc; } void kvm_arm_reset_id_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)@@ -465,39 +495,106 @@ void kvm_arm_reset_id_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) unsigned long i; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs); i++) - if (id_reg_descs[i].reset) - id_reg_descs[i].reset(vcpu, &id_reg_descs[i]); + if (id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc.reset) + id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc.reset(vcpu, &id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc); } int kvm_arm_get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) { - return kvm_sys_reg_get_user(vcpu, reg, - id_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs)); + u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr; + const struct sys_reg_desc *r; + struct sys_reg_params params; + u64 val; + int ret; + u32 id; + + if (!index_to_params(reg->id, ¶ms)) + return -ENOENT; + id = reg_to_encoding(¶ms); + + if (!is_id_reg(id)) + return -ENOENT; + + r = &id_reg_descs[IDREG_IDX(id)].reg_desc; + if (r->get_user) { + ret = (r->get_user)(vcpu, r, &val); + } else { + ret = 0; + val = 0;When get_user is NULL, I wonder why you want to treat them RAZ. It can be achieved by using visibility(), which I think might be better to use before calling get_user. Another option would be simply reading from IDREG(), which I would guess might be useful(?) when no special handling is necessary.
Will simply use the value from IDREG().
quoted
+ } + + if (!ret) + ret = put_user(val, uaddr); + + return ret; } int kvm_arm_set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) { - return kvm_sys_reg_set_user(vcpu, reg, - id_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs)); + u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr; + const struct sys_reg_desc *r; + struct sys_reg_params params; + u64 val; + int ret; + u32 id; + + if (!index_to_params(reg->id, ¶ms)) + return -ENOENT; + id = reg_to_encoding(¶ms); + + if (!is_id_reg(id)) + return -ENOENT; + + if (get_user(val, uaddr)) + return -EFAULT; + + r = &id_reg_descs[IDREG_IDX(id)].reg_desc; + + if (sysreg_user_write_ignore(vcpu, r)) + return 0; + + if (r->set_user) + ret = (r->set_user)(vcpu, r, val); + else + ret = 0;This appears to be the same handling as WI. How do you plan to use this set_user == NULL case ? I don't think this shouldn't happen with the current code. You might want to use WARN_ONCE here ?
Yes, you are right. It won't happen with current code. WIll use WARN_ONCE here.
quoted
+ + return ret; } bool kvm_arm_check_idreg_table(void) { - return check_sysreg_table(id_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs), false); + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs); i++) { + const struct sys_reg_desc *r = &id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc; + + if (r->reg && !r->reset) {I don't think we need to check "!r->reset". If r->reg is not NULL, I believe the entry must be incorrect.
I am not sure I got your idea here? r->reg usually should not be NULL.
quoted
+ kvm_err("sys_reg table %pS entry %d lacks reset\n", r, i); + return false; + } + + if (i && cmp_sys_reg(&id_reg_descs[i-1].reg_desc, r) >= 0) {In this table, each ID register needs to be in the proper place. So, I would think what should be checked would be if each entry in the table includes the right ID register. (e.g. id_reg_descs[0] must be for ID_PFR0_EL1, etc)
This comparison does the work, I think. It can detect any duplicate or non-ID entry, unless all entries are wrong and in the order.
Thank you, Reijiquoted
+ kvm_err("sys_reg table %pS entry %d out of order\n", + &id_reg_descs[i - 1].reg_desc, i - 1); + return false; + } + } + + return true; } /* Assumed ordered tables, see kvm_sys_reg_table_init. */ int kvm_arm_walk_id_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uind) { - const struct sys_reg_desc *i2, *end2; + const struct id_reg_desc *i2, *end2; unsigned int total = 0; int err; i2 = id_reg_descs; end2 = id_reg_descs + ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs); - while (i2 != end2) { - err = walk_one_sys_reg(vcpu, i2++, &uind, &total); + for (; i2 != end2; i2++) { + err = walk_one_sys_reg(vcpu, &(i2->reg_desc), &uind, &total); if (err) return err; }@@ -515,12 +612,12 @@ void kvm_arm_set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm) u64 val; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs); i++) { - id = reg_to_encoding(&id_reg_descs[i]); + id = reg_to_encoding(&id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_id_reg(id))) /* Shouldn't happen */ continue; - if (id_reg_descs[i].visibility == raz_visibility) + if (id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc.visibility == raz_visibility) /* Hidden or reserved ID register */ continue;diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index a4350f0737c3..cdcd61ac9868 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ int kvm_handle_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * Userspace API *****************************************************************************/ -static bool index_to_params(u64 id, struct sys_reg_params *params) +bool index_to_params(u64 id, struct sys_reg_params *params) { switch (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) { case KVM_REG_SIZE_U64:diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h index 5cfab83ce8b8..3797d1b494a2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static inline bool write_to_read_only(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return false; } +bool index_to_params(u64 id, struct sys_reg_params *params); const struct sys_reg_desc *get_reg_by_id(u64 id, const struct sys_reg_desc table[], unsigned int num); --2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog
Thanks, Jing _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel