Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 7/7] drm/i915/gt: use __xchg instead of internal helper

[PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-01-18
[PATCH v5 1/7] arch: rename all internal names __xchg to __arch_xchg · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-01-18
[PATCH v5 2/7] linux/include: add non-atomic version of xchg · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-01-18
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/7] linux/include: add non-atomic version of xchg · Andi Shyti <hidden> · 2023-02-27
[PATCH v5 3/7] arch/*/uprobes: simplify arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-01-18
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 3/7] arch/*/uprobes: simplify arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr · Andi Shyti <hidden> · 2023-02-27
[PATCH v5 4/7] llist: simplify __llist_del_all · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-01-18
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 4/7] llist: simplify __llist_del_all · Andi Shyti <hidden> · 2023-02-27
[PATCH v5 5/7] io_uring: use __xchg if possible · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-01-18
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 5/7] io_uring: use __xchg if possible · Andi Shyti <hidden> · 2023-02-27
[PATCH v5 6/7] qed: use __xchg if possible · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-01-18
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 6/7] qed: use __xchg if possible · Andi Shyti <hidden> · 2023-02-27
[PATCH v5 7/7] drm/i915/gt: use __xchg instead of internal helper · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-01-18
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 7/7] drm/i915/gt: use __xchg instead of internal helper · Andi Shyti <hidden> · 2023-02-27
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/7] arch: rename all internal names __xchg to __arch_xchg · Andi Shyti <hidden> · 2023-02-27
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-02-22
Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg · Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> · 2023-02-22
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2023-02-23
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg · Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> · 2023-02-27
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg · Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> · 2024-04-05
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg · Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> · 2024-04-05

From: Andi Shyti <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-27 09:58:28
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-alpha, linux-m68k, linux-mips, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-sh, lkml, loongarch, sparclinux

Hi Andrzej,

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:44:50PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:

Prefer core helper if available.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <redacted>

Thanks,
Andi

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help