Re: [PATCH V5 5/5] firmware: scm: Modify only the DLOAD bit in TCSR register for download mode
From: Mukesh Ojha <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-16 14:01:37
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 2/16/2023 5:30 PM, Poovendhan Selvaraj wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
CrashDump collection is based on the DLOAD bit of TCSR register. To retain other bits, we read the register and modify only the DLOAD bit as the other bits have their own significance. Co-developed-by: Anusha Rao <redacted> Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao <redacted> Co-developed-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <redacted> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <redacted> Signed-off-by: Poovendhan Selvaraj <redacted> --- Changes in V5: - checking the return value in qcom_scm_set_download_mode function as suggested by Srinivas Kandagatla Changes in V4: - retain the orginal value of tcsr register when download mode is not set drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c index 468d4d5ab550..d88c5f14bd54 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ int qcom_scm_set_remote_state(u32 state, u32 id) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_remote_state); -static int __qcom_scm_set_dload_mode(struct device *dev, bool enable) +static int __qcom_scm_set_dload_mode(struct device *dev, u32 val, bool enable) { struct qcom_scm_desc desc = { .svc = QCOM_SCM_SVC_BOOT,@@ -417,7 +417,8 @@ static int __qcom_scm_set_dload_mode(struct device *dev, bool enable) .owner = ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP, }; - desc.args[1] = enable ? QCOM_SCM_BOOT_SET_DLOAD_MODE : 0; + desc.args[1] = enable ? val | QCOM_SCM_BOOT_SET_DLOAD_MODE : + val & ~(QCOM_SCM_BOOT_SET_DLOAD_MODE); return qcom_scm_call_atomic(__scm->dev, &desc, NULL); }@@ -426,15 +427,25 @@ static void qcom_scm_set_download_mode(bool enable) { bool avail; int ret = 0; + u32 dload_addr_val; avail = __qcom_scm_is_call_available(__scm->dev, QCOM_SCM_SVC_BOOT, QCOM_SCM_BOOT_SET_DLOAD_MODE); + ret = qcom_scm_io_readl(__scm->dload_mode_addr, &dload_addr_val); + + if (ret) { + dev_err(__scm->dev, + "failed to read dload mode address value: %d\n", ret); + return; + } + if (avail) { - ret = __qcom_scm_set_dload_mode(__scm->dev, enable); + ret = __qcom_scm_set_dload_mode(__scm->dev, dload_addr_val, enable);
Did you test this on a target where it comes under this if statement? does it really need to know dload_mode_addr for this target ? -Mukesh
} else if (__scm->dload_mode_addr) {
- ret = qcom_scm_io_writel(__scm->dload_mode_addr,
- enable ? QCOM_SCM_BOOT_SET_DLOAD_MODE : 0);
+ ret = qcom_scm_io_writel(__scm->dload_mode_addr, enable ?
+ dload_addr_val | QCOM_SCM_BOOT_SET_DLOAD_MODE :
+ dload_addr_val & ~(QCOM_SCM_BOOT_SET_DLOAD_MODE));
} else {
dev_err(__scm->dev,
"No available mechanism for setting download mode\n");_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel