On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 21:37:09 +0100
Bastian Germann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add an allwinner,sun50i-a64-hwspinlock compatible string to the device
tree binding. The A31 and A64 have compatible hwspinlocks.
Signed-off-by: Bastian Germann <redacted>
---
.../bindings/hwlock/allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock.yaml | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock.yaml
index 6cdfe22deb3c..281c285282a1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock.yaml
@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ description:
properties:
compatible:
- const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock
+ items:
+ - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock
+ - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-hwspinlock
So this would not allow the previous single compatible string, which I
think we should preserve?
You can check out other bindings (like allwinner,sun6i-a31-spi.yaml) to
get an idea of how this could be written.
Cheers,
Andre
reg:
maxItems: 1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel