On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 8:12 AM Heiko Stübner [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi,

Am Freitag, 3. Februar 2023, 20:02:54 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:

quoted

On 2/3/23 19:21, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 03:22:14PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:

quoted

Convert rockchip-lvds.txt to YAML.

Changed:
  Add power-domains property.
  Requirements between PX30 and RK3288

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---

Changed V3:
  Filename matching compatible style
  Drop "Regulator phandle for "
  Specify properties and requirements per SoC
  Sort order and restyle

Changed V2:
  Fix title
---
 .../display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml       | 170 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../display/rockchip/rockchip-lvds.txt        |  92 ----------
 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml
 delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-lvds.txt

quoted

What's the plan for these patches? Don't see them in linux-next still.
Do you want me to take patches 1-8?

Hi,

The display patches normally go through the DRM git.
Patch 2 must merge with grf.yaml.
Heiko has merged now 3 PHY related patches to grf.yaml first.

[PATCH v6 02/17] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: add rockchip,lvds.yaml

See current
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/log/?h=for-next&qt=grep&q=jonker

Not sure what Heiko's plans are.
Patch 2 replaces  only a description text and some accolades removal, so not "too" important.

I urgent then you could merge without conflict:
1, 3-8

So I've applied patches 1-7 to the drm-tree now.

That would have been good a month ago. Now these won't land til 6.4.
:( For that reason, if it is after the drm-misc cutoff, I prefer to
take DT bindings via my tree.

For the GRF-patch, I've dropped the quotes changes, as they are somewhat
unrelated to the lvds inclusion and so prevented any conflicts when applying
the rest to the DRM tree.

Only 1 hunk needed to be dropped to avoid the conflict (which also
dropped quotes). If all the quote changes were dropped, please send
another patch for that.

@Rob, if you could pick the fusb302 patch (number8), that would be great

Will do.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel