Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 4 authors, 2023-02-02

RE: [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: media: platform: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti Video Input Interface bindings

From: <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-01 11:30:24
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-media, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 6:46 PM
To: ishikawa yuji(石川 悠司 ○RDC□AITC○EA開)
[off-list ref]
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org; hverkuil@xs4all.nl; mchehab@kernel.org;
iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 □SWC◯ACT)
[off-list ref]; robh+dt@kernel.org;
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com;
broonie@kernel.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: media: platform: visconti: Add Toshiba
Visconti Video Input Interface bindings

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:06:25AM +0000, yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp wrote:
quoted
On Monday, January 23, 2023 4:26 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 06:01:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On 17/01/2023 16:58, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:42:51PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On 17/01/2023 16:26, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
quoted
quoted
+
+          clock-lanes:
+            description: VIIF supports 1 clock line
s/line/lane/
Sorry for a late reply.
I'll fix the description.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+            const: 0
I would also add

          clock-noncontinuous: true
          link-frequencies: true

to indicate that the above two properties are used by this device.
No, these are coming from other schema and there is never need
to mention some property to indicate it is more used than other case.
None of the bindings are created such way, so this should not be
exception.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
There are some bindings that do so, but that may not be a good
enough reason, as there's a chance I wrote those myself :-)

I would have sworn that at some point in the past the schema
wouldn't have validated the example with this omitted. I'm not
sure if something changed or if I got this wrong.
You probably think about case when using
additionalProperties:false, where one has to explicitly list all
valid properties. But not for unevaluatedProperties:false.
Possibly, yes.
quoted
quoted
video-interfaces.yaml defines lots of properties applicable to
endpoints. For a given device, those properties should be
required
required:
 - foo
quoted
(easy, that's defined in the bindings), optional,
by default (with unevaluatedProperties:false) or explicitly
mention
"foo: true (with additionalProperties:false)
quoted
 or forbidden. How do
foo: false (with unevaluatedProperties:false) or by default (with
additionalProperties:false)
I think we should default to the latter. video-interfaces.yaml
contains lots of properties endpoint properties, most bindings will
use less than half of them, so having to explicitly list all the
ones that are not used with "foo: false" would be quite
inconvenient. Furthermore, I expect more properties to be added to
video-interfaces.yaml over time, and those shouldn't be accepted by default
in existing bindings.
quoted
quoted
I caught up with this discussion after some exercise on JSON schema
validator.
quoted
I'll remove "unevaluatedProperties: false" at the "endpoint" and add
"aditionalProperties: false" instead.
quoted
Furthermore, I'll explicitly declare required properties (required: ["foo"]) and
optional properties (properties: {foo: true}) for Visconti.
quoted
Is this correct understanding?
Looks very good to me !
quoted
Are these changes also applied to "port", which is the parent node of
the "endpoint" ?
That shouldn't be needed, as the "port" node should only have "endpoint"
children and no other properties (except for reg, and possibly #address-cells and
#size-cells of course).
All right. I'll apply the change to "endpoint".
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
we differentiate between the latter two cases ?
--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
Regards,
Yuji Ishikawa
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help