Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Update sched_clock when non-boot CPUs need counter workaround
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-01-20 05:26:13
Also in:
lkml, stable
On 2023-01-19 07:59, 刘琦 wrote:
[Test Report]
Result: Test Pass
A total of two rounds of pending testing
a. The first round of hanging test
Number of machines: 200
Hanging test duration: 48h
Hanging test results: no walt crash problem
b. The second round of hanging test
Number of machines: 200
Hanging test duration: 72h
Hanging test results: no walt crash problem
Tested-by: wangfajie <redacted>
Tested-by: liurenwang <redacted>
Tested-by: zhanghui <redacted>
Tested-by: liangke <redacted>
Thanks for this.
The only issue here is that that you don't explain what you tested,
nor how you tested it.
It is also a patch that has known defects (you just have to read the
thread for the details)... This makes this testing, no matter how
thorough it is, rather ineffective.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel