Re: [PATCH v27 6/7] drm/mediatek: add drm ovl_adaptor sub driver for MT8195

Dear Nicolas,

Thanks for the review.

On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 17:28 -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 11:26:09AM +0800, Nancy.Lin wrote:

quoted

Add drm ovl_adaptor sub driver. Bring up ovl_adaptor sub driver if
the component exists in the path.

Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <redacted>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <redacted>
Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Bo-Chen Chen <redacted>
Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <redacted>
Change-Id: I0501f3c80e78ec8279366cba9c137a2edd7a852e
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c     |  61 ++++-----
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h     |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 129 ++++++++++++--
------
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h |  50 +++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c      |  78 ++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h      |  12 +-
 6 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c

b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
index 30dcb65d8a5a..ce5617ad04cb 100644

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c

[..]

quoted

 int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
-			const enum mtk_ddp_comp_id *path, unsigned int
path_len,
+			const unsigned int *path, unsigned int
path_len,

Hi Nancy,

why is 'enum mtk_ddp_comp_id' being changed to 'unsigned int'
throughout this
patch? Was this intentional?

I saw that this change happened between v16 [1] and v17 [2], but I
didn't see
any reply or mention about this in the commit message or cover
letter.

Thanks,
Nícolas

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220318142009.2796-21-nancy.lin@mediatek.com/ (local)
[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220416020749.29010-20-nancy.lin@mediatek.com/ (local)

The change is for the review in [1] to expose each mod instead of ovl
adaptor to mtk_mutex.
Ovl adaptor is an application that combine these mod to achieve ovl
function, and it's not a real component in mtk_mmsys/mtk_mutex.

For the above comment, I discussed the solution with MediaTek DRM
reviewer CK.Hu internally.
1. remove the DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_ADAPTOR in enum mtk_ddp_comp_id{}  (ref
[2])
2. add DRM driver component define "DDP_COMPONENT_DRM_OVL_ADAPTOR" in
mtk_drm_drv.h (ref[3])
3. replace mmsys compoent DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_ADAPTOR with DRM driver
compoent DDP_COMPONENT_DRM_OVL_ADAPTOR in drm mt8195_mtk_ddp_ext[] path
array. (ref[3] - mtk_drm_drv.c)
   
    static const unsigned int mt8195_mtk_ddp_ext[] = {
		DDP_COMPONENT_DRM_OVL_ADAPTOR,
		DDP_COMPONENT_MERGE5,
		DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF1,
    };
Because the DDP_COMPONENT_DRM_OVL_ADAPTOR is not a real mmsys
component, change to use "unsigned int" instead of "enum
mtk_ddp_comp_id{}"


[1] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220318142009.2796-10-nancy.lin@mediatek.com/
[2] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220318142009.2796-5-nancy.lin@mediatek.com/
[3] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20221103032610.9217-7-nancy.lin@mediatek.com/

Thanks,
Nancy

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel