On 10/27/2022 6:55 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote:

Hi Elliot,

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:58:34AM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:

quoted

Gunyah message queues are a unidirectional inter-VM pipe for messages up
to 1024 bytes. This driver supports pairing a receiver message queue and
a transmitter message queue to expose a single mailbox channel.

Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <redacted>

<snip>

quoted

+static irqreturn_t gh_msgq_tx_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct gh_msgq *msgq = data;
+
+	mbox_chan_txdone(gh_msgq_chan(msgq), 0);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static void gh_msgq_txdone_tasklet(unsigned long data)
+{
+	struct gh_msgq *msgq = (struct gh_msgq *)data;
+
+	mbox_chan_txdone(gh_msgq_chan(msgq), msgq->last_status);
+}
+
+static int gh_msgq_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
+{
+	struct gh_msgq *msgq = mbox_chan_to_msgq(chan);
+	struct gh_msgq_tx_data *msgq_data = data;
+	u64 tx_flags = 0;
+	unsigned long ret;
+	bool ready;
+
+	if (msgq_data->push)
+		tx_flags |= GH_HYPERCALL_MSGQ_TX_FLAGS_PUSH;
+
+	ret = gh_hypercall_msgq_send(msgq->tx_ghrsc->capid, msgq_data->length,
+					(uintptr_t)msgq_data->data, tx_flags, &ready);
+
+	/**
+	 * unlikely because Linux tracks state of msgq and should not try to
+	 * send message when msgq is full.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(ret == GH_ERROR_MSGQUEUE_FULL))
+		return -EAGAIN;
+
+	/**
+	 * Propagate all other errors to client. If we return error to mailbox
+	 * framework, then no other messages can be sent and nobody will know
+	 * to retry this message.
+	 */
+	msgq->last_status = gh_remap_error(ret);
+
+	/**
+	 * This message was successfully sent, but message queue isn't ready to
+	 * receive more messages because it's now full. Mailbox framework
+	 * requires that we only report that message was transmitted only when
+	 * we're ready to transmit another message. We'll get that in the form
+	 * of tx IRQ once the other side starts to drain the msgq.
+	 */
+	if (ret == GH_ERROR_OK && !ready)
+		return 0;
+
+	/**
+	 * We can send more messages. Mailbox framework requires that tx done
+	 * happens asynchronously to sending the message. Gunyah message queues
+	 * tell us right away on the hypercall return whether we can send more
+	 * messages. To work around this, defer the txdone to a tasklet.
+	 */
+	tasklet_schedule(&msgq->txdone_tasklet);
+

Nice comments.

irq_work would be a better choice.

quoted

+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct mbox_chan_ops gh_msgq_ops = {
+	.send_data = gh_msgq_send_data,
+};
+
+/**
+ * gh_msgq_init() - Initialize a Gunyah message queue with an mbox_client
+ * @parent: optional, device parent used for the mailbox controller
+ * @msgq: Pointer to the gh_msgq to initialize
+ * @cl: A mailbox client to bind to the mailbox channel that the message queue creates
+ * @tx_ghrsc: optional, the transmission side of the message queue
+ * @rx_ghrsc: optional, the receiving side of the message queue
+ *
+ * At least one of tx_ghrsc and rx_ghrsc should be not NULL. Most message queue use cases come with
+ * a pair of message queues to facilitiate bidirectional communication. When tx_ghrsc is set,
+ * the client can send messages with mbox_send_message(gh_msgq_chan(msgq), msg). When rx_ghrsc
+ * is set, the mbox_client should register an .rx_callback() and the message queue driver will
+ * push all available messages upon receiving the RX ready interrupt. The messages should be
+ * consumed or copied by the client right away as the gh_msgq_rx_data will be replaced/destroyed
+ * after the callback.
+ *
+ * Returns - 0 on success, negative otherwise
+ */
+int gh_msgq_init(struct device *parent, struct gh_msgq *msgq, struct mbox_client *cl,
+		     struct gunyah_resource *tx_ghrsc, struct gunyah_resource *rx_ghrsc)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Must have at least a tx_ghrsc or rx_ghrsc and that they are the right device types */
+	if ((!tx_ghrsc && !rx_ghrsc) ||
+	    (tx_ghrsc && tx_ghrsc->type != GUNYAH_RESOURCE_TYPE_MSGQ_TX) ||
+	    (rx_ghrsc && rx_ghrsc->type != GUNYAH_RESOURCE_TYPE_MSGQ_RX))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	msgq->tx_ghrsc = tx_ghrsc;
+	msgq->rx_ghrsc = rx_ghrsc;
+
+	msgq->mbox.dev = parent;
+	msgq->mbox.ops = &gh_msgq_ops;
+	msgq->mbox.chans = kcalloc(1, sizeof(*msgq->mbox.chans), GFP_KERNEL);

Error handling missing.

minor nit pick:

If you initialize num_chans to 1 before, then you can use that as the first
argument to kcalloc() which makes it more readable since you opted for kcalloc()
instead of kzalloc() there.

quoted

+	msgq->mbox.num_chans = 1;
+	msgq->mbox.txdone_irq = true;
+
+	if (gh_msgq_has_tx(msgq)) {
+		ret = request_irq(msgq->tx_ghrsc->irq, gh_msgq_tx_irq_handler, 0, "gh_msgq_tx",
+				msgq);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err_chans;
+	}
+
+	if (gh_msgq_has_rx(msgq)) {
+		ret = request_threaded_irq(msgq->rx_ghrsc->irq, NULL, gh_msgq_rx_irq_handler,
+						IRQF_ONESHOT, "gh_msgq_rx", msgq);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err_tx_irq;
+	}
+
+	tasklet_init(&msgq->txdone_tasklet, gh_msgq_txdone_tasklet, (unsigned long)msgq);

If you wish to use tasklets, use tasklet_setup().

quoted

+
+	ret = mbox_controller_register(&msgq->mbox);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_rx_irq;
+
+	ret = mbox_bind_client(gh_msgq_chan(msgq), cl);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_mbox;
+
+	return 0;
+err_mbox:
+	mbox_controller_unregister(&msgq->mbox);
+err_rx_irq:
+	if (gh_msgq_has_rx(msgq))
+		free_irq(msgq->rx_ghrsc->irq, msgq);
+err_tx_irq:
+	if (gh_msgq_has_tx(msgq))
+		free_irq(msgq->tx_ghrsc->irq, msgq);
+err_chans:
+	kfree(msgq->mbox.chans);
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_msgq_init);
+
+void gh_msgq_remove(struct gh_msgq *msgq)
+{
+	if (gh_msgq_has_rx(msgq))
+		free_irq(msgq->rx_ghrsc->irq, msgq);
+
+	if (gh_msgq_has_tx(msgq))
+		free_irq(msgq->tx_ghrsc->irq, msgq);
+
+	kfree(msgq->mbox.chans);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_msgq_remove);
+

Is gh_msgq_remove() supposed to undo every thing done in gh_msgq_init()?
ex: mbox controller and channel are not unregistered.

Ah thanks for catching, updated this as well as rest of your comments.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel