Re: [PATCH V2 1/6] dt-bindings: usb: usbmisc-imx: convert to DT schema
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2022-10-15 14:53:13
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-usb, lkml
On 14/10/2022 05:51, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Convert usbmisc-imx to DT schema format. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ .../devicetree/bindings/usb/usbmisc-imx.txt | 18 ------- 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usbmisc-imx.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c83ffb6729b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: Freescale i.MX non-core registers
You sent v2 before we finished this topic. Is it correct? Even if TXT had such title, let's don't keep the wrong name. If it is non-core registers, why it is in USB? Why it is an usb-misc device?
+ +maintainers: + - Xu Yang [off-list ref] +
Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel