Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support attaching to i.MX8QXP M4 | linux-arm-kernel

quoted

On Thu, 29 Sept 2022 at 17:17, Peng Fan [off-list ref] wrote:


On 9/29/2022 10:58 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 21:52, Peng Fan [off-list ref] wrote:

Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support attaching to
i.MX8QXP M4

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 06:01:45PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi Mathieu,

On 9/28/2022 3:39 PM, Peng Fan wrote:

On 9/28/2022 1:56 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:48:02AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi Mathieu,

Thanks for reviewing this patchset.
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support
attaching to i.MX8QXP M4

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 09:10:20AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

When M4 is kicked by SCFW, M4 runs in its own hardware
partition, Linux could only do IPC with M4, it could not
start, stop, update image.

We disable recovery reboot when M4 is managed by SCFW,
because remoteproc core still not support M4 auto-recovery
without loading image.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
   drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 108
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
   1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index
7cc4fd207e2d..bcba74e90020
100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
   #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
   #include <linux/clk.h>
   #include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/firmware/imx/sci.h>
   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
   #include <linux/kernel.h>
   #include <linux/mailbox_client.h> @@ -59,6 +60,8 @@
   #define IMX_SIP_RPROC_STARTED        0x01
   #define IMX_SIP_RPROC_STOP        0x02

+#define IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED    5
+
   /**
    * struct imx_rproc_mem - slim internal memory structure
    * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region @@
-89,6
+92,10 @@ struct imx_rproc {
       struct work_struct        rproc_work;
       struct workqueue_struct        *workqueue;
       void __iomem            *rsc_table;
+    struct imx_sc_ipc        *ipc_handle;
+    struct notifier_block        rproc_nb;
+    u32                rproc_pt;    /* partition id */
+    u32                rsrc_id;    /* resource id */
   };

   static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] =
{ @@ -117,6
+124,18 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att
+imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
       { 0xD0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },  };

+static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp[] =
+{
+    { 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
+    /* TCML/U */
+    { 0x1FFE0000, 0x34FE0000, 0x00040000, ATT_OWN |
+ATT_IOMEM },
+    /* OCRAM(Low 96KB) */
+    { 0x21000000, 0x00100000, 0x00018000, 0 },
+    /* OCRAM */
+    { 0x21100000, 0x00100000, 0x00040000, 0 },
+    /* DDR (Data) */
+    { 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 0x60000000, 0 }, };
+
   static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mn[] =
{
       /* dev addr , sys addr  , size        , flags */
       /* ITCM   */
@@ -255,6 +274,12 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg
imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mq = {
       .method        = IMX_RPROC_MMIO,
   };

+static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp =
+{
+    .att        = imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp,
+    .att_size    = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp),
+    .method        = IMX_RPROC_SCU_API, };
+
   static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp =
{
       .att        = imx_rproc_att_imx8ulp,
       .att_size    = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8ulp),
@@ -680,6 +705,37 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct
rproc
*rproc)
       mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
   }

+static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc) {
+    struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
+    const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
+
+    if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
+        return;
+
+    if (!imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle,
priv->rsrc_id))
+        return;
+
+    imx_scu_irq_group_enable(IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED,
BIT(priv->rproc_pt), false);
+    imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
+}
+
+static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block
+*nb,
+                      unsigned long event, void *group) {
+    struct imx_rproc *priv = container_of(nb, struct
+imx_rproc, rproc_nb);
+
+    /* Ignore other irqs */
+    if (!((event & BIT(priv->rproc_pt)) && (*(u8 *)group ==
IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED)))
+        return 0;
+
+    rproc_report_crash(priv->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
+
+    pr_info("Partition%d reset!\n", priv->rproc_pt);
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
   static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
{
       struct regmap_config config = { .name = "imx-rproc" };
@@ -689,6
+745,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc
+*priv)
       struct arm_smccc_res res;
       int ret;
       u32 val;
+    u8 pt;

       switch (dcfg->method) {
       case IMX_RPROC_NONE:
@@ -699,6 +756,51 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct
imx_rproc *priv)
           if (res.a0)
               priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
           return 0;
+    case IMX_RPROC_SCU_API:
+        ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&priv->ipc_handle);
+        if (ret)
+            return ret;
+        ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
+"fsl,resource-id",
&priv->rsrc_id);
+        if (ret) {
+            dev_err(dev, "No fsl,resource-id property\n");
+            return ret;
+        }
+
+        /*
+         * If Mcore resource is not owned by Acore
+partition, It is
kicked by ROM,
+         * and Linux could only do IPC with Mcore and nothing else.
+         */
+        if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle,
+priv-
rsrc_id))
+            return 0;
If imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned() return '1' than the remote
processor is under Linux's control and what follows below is
not needed.
That is also
coherent with the comment in [1].
Case 1: If M4 is owned by Linux, here directly return 0.
Case 2: If M4 is not owned by Linux, the following code after
this line will set state as RPROC_DETACHED.
I understand that part.

Patch 3/6(this patch) is only to support case 2.
Patch 4/6 is to support case 1.
Let's leave the subsequent patches alone for now.

That is in contrast with what is happening in
imx_rproc_put_scu().  There, if the remote processor is _not_
owned by Linux than the condition returns without calling
imx_scu_irq_group_enable() and
imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier().  That seems to be a bug.
No. The two functions only needed when M4 is in a separate
hardware partition.

The scu irq is only needed when M4 is out of linux control and
need some notification such as M4 is reset by SCU(System Control
Unit).
That linux got
notification that M4 is reset by SCU.
I also understand that part.

What I am underlining here is that when the M4 is independent,
function
imx_scu_irq_register_notifier() and imx_scu_irq_group_enable() are
called but their cleanup equivalent are not called in
imx_rproc_put_scu() because of the '!'
in the if() statement.
you are right, this is bug in my side. It should be as below based
on patch 3/6.

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index bcba74e90020..a56aecae00c6
100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc
*rproc)
          if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
                  return;

-       if (!imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle,
priv->rsrc_id))
+       if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle,
+priv->rsrc_id))
Indeed, which raises questions about how this patchset was tested.  And it
is not the first time we touch base on that.
Patch 4/6 has this change, anyway I should not mix patch 3,4 here.


                  return;

Thanks for detailed reviewing.
If you are fine with this change, I could send out V6. Anyway, I'll
wait to see if you have other comments in this patchset.
I am out of time for this patchset and as such will not provide more
comments on this revision.
Sure. Thanks for your time. Since you have applied the attach recovery
part, next version will enable this feature in imx rproc.
I would rather not.  Please introduce support for the recovery in
another patchset, once this one has been merged.
I pushed the button too early, sorry. V6 was out yesterday, but the new
patch 7/7 is an incremetenl patch to enable attach recovery.
Right, I noticed that after replying to you.

You could ignore patch 7/7 in V6, I will reply their to note. patch
[1-6]/7 is to achieve same as V5 patchset.

If you need to send V7 which just drop patch 7/7 in V6, please let me know.
It is not a problem if all the new functionality is in a patch on its
own.  At least the mental picture I have of the first 6 patches
doesn't change.  No need to send a new revision.

Thanks,
Peng.


Thanks,
Peng.


Thanks,
Peng.

Thanks,
Peng.



There is also a problem in patch 4/6 associated to that.
If the upper explanation eliminate your concern, "a problem in
patch 4/6" should not be a problem.

When M4 is owned by Linux, Linux need handle the power domain.
If M4 is not owned
by Linux, SCU firmware will handle the power domain, and Linux
has no permission to touch that.

Thanks
Peng

Thanks,
Mathieu


[1].
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2
F%2Felixir
.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.0-
rc7%2Fsource%2Fdrivers%2Ffirmware%2Fimx%2Frm.c%23L24&amp;data=
0
5%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cbe679e9a409a48b834b908daa015d92
c%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637998312946913
710%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2lu
MzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=
JDRvoDGGgEiSmbhj3410V2DNxamZbDmMS0U2GvBnI74%3D&amp;reserved
=0

+
+        priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
+        priv->rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
+
+        /* Get partition id and enable irq in SCFW */
+        ret =
+imx_sc_rm_get_resource_owner(priv->ipc_handle,
priv->rsrc_id, &pt);
+        if (ret) {
+            dev_err(dev, "not able to get resource
+owner\n");
+            return ret;
+        }
+
+        priv->rproc_pt = pt;
+        priv->rproc_nb.notifier_call =
+imx_rproc_partition_notify;
+
+        ret =
+imx_scu_irq_register_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
+        if (ret) {
+            dev_warn(dev, "register scu notifier
+failed.\n");
+            return ret;
+        }
+
+        ret =
imx_scu_irq_group_enable(IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED,
BIT(priv-
rproc_pt),
+                           true);
+        if (ret) {
+
+imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
+            dev_warn(dev, "Enable irq failed.\n");
+            return ret;
+        }
+
+        return 0;
       default:
           break;
       }
@@ -803,7 +905,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct
platform_device
*pdev)

       ret = imx_rproc_clk_enable(priv);
       if (ret)
-        goto err_put_mbox;
+        goto err_put_scu;

       INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_rproc_vq_work);

@@ -820,6 +922,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct
platform_device
*pdev)

   err_put_clk:
       clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
+err_put_scu:
+    imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
   err_put_mbox:
       imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
   err_put_wkq:
@@ -837,6 +941,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_remove(struct
platform_device
*pdev)

       clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
       rproc_del(rproc);
+    imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
       imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
       destroy_workqueue(priv->workqueue);
       rproc_free(rproc);
@@ -852,6 +957,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
imx_rproc_of_match[] = {
       { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-cm4", .data =
&imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mq },
       { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-cm7", .data =
&imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
       { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-cm7", .data =
&imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
+    { .compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-cm4", .data =
&imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp },
       { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-cm33", .data =
&imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp },
       { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-cm33", .data =
&imx_rproc_cfg_imx93 },
       {},
--
2.37.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help