Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 4 authors, 2022-09-21

Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] dt-bindings: serial: atmel,at91-usart: convert to json-schema

From: <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-20 07:52:14
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-serial, linux-spi, lkml

On 19.09.2022 20:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:08:40 +0300, Sergiu Moga wrote:
quoted
Convert at91 USART DT Binding for Atmel/Microchip SoCs to
json-schema format. Furthermore, move this binding to the
serial directory, since binding directories match hardware,
unlike the driver subsystems which match Linux convention.

Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>
---


v1 -> v2:
- only do what the commit says, split the addition of other compatibles and
properties in other patches
- remove unnecessary "|"'s
- mention header in `atmel,usart-mode`'s description
- place `if:` under `allOf:`
- respect order of spi0's DT properties: compatible, then reg then the reset of properties

v2 -> v3:
- Previously [PATCH 5]
- Check value of `atmel,usart-mode` instead of the node regex
- Define all properties top level and disallow them explicitly for other type,
since additionalProperties:false conflicts with referencing other schemas
- Remove useless else if: after else:


v3 -> v4:
- add R-b tag, this was previously [PATCH 6]




  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt   |  98 ----------
  .../bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml     | 182 ++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.

Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.

Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
Hello, thank you for checking :). The above link issues a 404. 
Everything should be fine though once all of the below are merged:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/53e72e5d-47fc-403d-c969-61b267a9ff15@microchip.com/ (local)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1ae89854-74fa-6194-304f-db31d56d3674@microchip.com/ (local)

together with the patch series that I linked into the cover letter as a 
dependence:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220916075744.1879428-1-kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com/ (local)


Thank you,
	Sergiu
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help