Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 3 authors, 2022-09-07

Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] firmware: arm_ffa: Set up 32bit execution mode flag using partiion property

From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-07 11:01:52
Also in: lkml, op-tee

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 11:01:27AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 2:40 PM Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
FF-A v1.1 adds a flag in the partition properties to indicate if the
partition runs in the AArch32 or AArch64 execution state. Use the same
to set-up the 32-bit execution flag mode in the ffa_dev automatically
and ignore any requests to do the same from the ffa_driver.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 include/linux/arm_ffa.h           |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
index dd6ab2f81580..dbbe15592173 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
@@ -647,11 +647,19 @@ static int ffa_partition_info_get(const char *uuid_str,
        return 0;
 }

-static void ffa_mode_32bit_set(struct ffa_device *dev)
+static void _ffa_mode_32bit_set(struct ffa_device *dev)
 {
        dev->mode_32bit = true;
 }

+static void ffa_mode_32bit_set(struct ffa_device *dev)
+{
+       if (drv_info->version > FFA_VERSION_1_0)
+               return;
+
+       _ffa_mode_32bit_set(dev);
+}
+
 static int ffa_sync_send_receive(struct ffa_device *dev,
                                 struct ffa_send_direct_data *data)
 {
@@ -743,6 +751,9 @@ static void ffa_setup_partitions(void)
                               __func__, tpbuf->id);
                        continue;
                }
+
+               if (tpbuf->properties & FFA_PARTITION_AARCH64_EXEC)
Shouldn't this be !(tpbuf->properties & FFA_PARTITION_AARCH64_EXEC)?

Before this, we used 64-bit calling convention by default for FF-A
v1.0. I suppose we would like to keep that behaviour.
Correct, it is stupid mistake on my part. I did notice this but somehow
messed up not to add the change I made to test with OPTEE. Thanks for
noticing this.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help