On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 18:10:06 +0100
Jonathan Cameron [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 30 May 2022 20:33:24 +0300
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
First of all, the additional conversion from vIRQ, and this is exactly
what is returned by platform_get_irq_byname(), to vIRQ is not needed.
Confusing sentence form. Perhaps:
First, the additional conversion from vIRQ (returned by platform_get_irq_byname())
to vIRQ is not needed.
quoted
Hence, drop no-op call to irq_of_parse_and_map().
Second, assign the firmware node instead of of_node.
...
quoted
Seems sensible to me, but I'd like a sanity check from someone more
familiar with this driver.
This one has been outstanding for a few weeks. I'd still like
an Ack or similar form someone who knows this device well.
If no one has looked at it in a week or so I'll just go with
my judgement and pick it up.
Any news on this one? Maybe I need to resend with the better commit message?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel