Re: [PATCH 01/16] powerpc: Replace unreachable() with it's builtin variant in WARN_ON()
From: Sathvika Vasireddy <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-29 05:47:32
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
Hi Christophe, On 26/08/22 15:48, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 08/08/2022 à 13:48, Sathvika Vasireddy a écrit :quoted
objtool is throwing *unannotated intra-function call* warnings with a few instructions that are marked unreachable. Replace unreachable() with __builtin_unreachable() to fix these warnings, as the codegen remains same with unreachable() and __builtin_unreachable(). Signed-off-by: Sathvika Vasireddy <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h index 61a4736355c2..074be1a78c56 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ __label__ __label_warn_on; \ \ WARN_ENTRY("twi 31, 0, 0", BUGFLAG_WARNING | (flags), __label_warn_on); \ - unreachable(); \ + __builtin_unreachable(); \Should you add barrier_before_unreachable() before __builtin_unreachable() to avoid stack bombs ? See commit 173a3efd3edb ("bug.h: work around GCC PR82365 in BUG()")
Yes, adding barrier_before_unreachable() before __builtin_unreachable() works around the build issues reported at https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/8/25/418. I'll post a v2 with this change. Thanks for the suggestion! - Sathvika _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel