Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2022-09-08
STALE1438d

Revision v2 of 2 in this series.

Revisions (2)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 current

[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: replace this_cpu_* with raw_cpu_* in panic_bad_stack()

From: Zhen Lei <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-26 09:56:48
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: arm port, the rest · Maintainers: Russell King, Linus Torvalds

The hardware automatically disable the IRQ interrupt before jumping to the
interrupt or exception vector. Therefore, the preempt_disable() operation
in this_cpu_read() after macro expansion is unnecessary for exception
handler. Use raw_cpu_* instead of this_cpu_* can reduce a few lines of
assembly code. To be honest, the fewer unnecessary operations in exception
handler, the better.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <redacted>
---
KernelVersion: v6.0-rc2
 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 1518a1f443ff866..d5903d790cf3b7e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -927,9 +927,9 @@ asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	unsigned long tsk_stk = (unsigned long)current->stack;
 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQSTACKS
-	unsigned long irq_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr);
+	unsigned long irq_stk = (unsigned long)raw_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr);
 #endif
-	unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_read(overflow_stack_ptr);
+	unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)raw_cpu_read(overflow_stack_ptr);
 
 	console_verbose();
 	pr_emerg("Insufficient stack space to handle exception!");
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help