On 23.08.2022 13:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 20/08/2022 11:07, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:

quoted

Define DSA port binding per switch model as each switch model requires
different values for certain properties.

Define reg property on $defs as it's the same for all switch models.

Remove unnecessary lines as they are already included from the referred
dsa.yaml.

Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <redacted>
---
  .../bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml     | 56 +++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
index 657e162a1c01..7c4374e16f96 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml

@@ -130,38 +130,47 @@ properties:
        ethsys.
      maxItems: 1
  
-patternProperties:
-  "^(ethernet-)?ports$":
-    type: object
-
-    patternProperties:
-      "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
-        type: object
-        description: Ethernet switch ports

Again, I don't understand why do you remove definitions of these nodes
from top-level properties. I explained what I expect in previous
discussion and I am confused to hear "this cannot be done".

I agree it can be done, but the binding is done with less lines the 
current way.

I would need to add more lines than just for creating the node structure 
since dsa.yaml is not referred.

Then, I would have to create the node structure again for the dsa-port 
checks.

Arınç

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel