Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek: mt8188: Add binding for MM & INFRA IOMMU

On 18/08/2022 10:26, Chengci.Xu wrote:

quoted

quoted

     then:
       required:

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/memory/mt8188-memory-port.h
 b/include/dt-bindings/memory/mt8188-memory-port.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..612fd366c3a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/memory/mt8188-memory-port.h

Use vendor prefix in filename, so mediatek,mt8188-memory-port.h

Is this a new mandatory rules to add a vendor prefix in dt-bindings
file name? we have never add a vendor prefix before.

If possible, we'd like not to use vendor prefix for the consistency of
fliename's format(mtxxxx-memory-port.h).
Such as "mt8195-memory-port.h" and "mt8186-memory-port.h".

That's a generic rule, although loosely applied. The consistency is
rather to have a vendor prefix everywhere. Why Mediatek should have an
exception?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel