On 17/08/2022 11:39, Samuel Holland wrote:

quoted

quoted

The same question applies for the D1 SoC DTSI, where I use this same construct.

This is not correct and should be fixed. Either you add the schema with
compatible or please drop the device node from the DTSI.

That's what I was afraid of.

The bindings can grow, so you can add a bindings stub documenting
compatibles (device + simple-mfd + syscon) and IO space, then later
extend it. Of course it is preferred to add bindings as complete as
possible, but incremental growing also works.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel