Re: imx8mm lcdif->dsi->adv7535 no video, no errors
From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Date: 2022-08-03 12:17:56
Also in:
dri-devel, lkml
Hi Adam On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 12:03, Adam Ford [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 1:20 AM Marco Felsch [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 22-08-02, Adam Ford wrote: ...quoted
quoted
I did some reading about the internal timing generator. It appears that it's required when video formats use fractional bytes, and it's preconfigured to run at 720p by default, but registers 28h through 37h configure it for other video modes.I think there may still be some issues with the DSIM since some of the clock frequencies are set in the device tree. From what I can tell, the pixel rate is calculated based on theBy pixel rate you mean the HDMI pixel rate from the ADV? If so then yes. The ADV has an divider which is already configured by the driver but meaningless since the driver is lacking of setting the "manual-divider" bit within the same register.I was thinking about the pixel clock from the DSI to the ADV. I did see the manual-divider bit was missing. I tried enabling that bit, but it didn't appear to make much difference.quoted
quoted
burst-clock-frequency and that generates a byte clock. For 891000000, the byte clock is 111375000.The burst-clock-frequency is the hs-clk and DDR. So the MIPI-DSI clock is burst-clock-frequency/2 which is in your case: 891000000/2 = 445500000. This clock is than divided by 3 within the ADV and you get your 148500000 pixel clock. This divide by 3 is detected automatically by the ADV due to the missing bit (see above).quoted
Modetest timings for 1080p show: index name refresh (Hz) hdisp hss hse htot vdisp vss vse vtot #0 1920x1080 60.00 1920 2008 2052 2200 1080 1084 1089 1125 148500 flags: nhsync, nvsync; type: driver When looking at modetest, there is a clock for 1080p which appears to be 148500. 111375000/148500 = 750.Please see above.quoted
The rest of the entries in my table do not divide evenly. I don;t know if that explains the lack of display, but it's something to note. It seems to me that instead of fixing the samsung,burst-clock-frequency to 891000000, we should make the desired PLL related to the desired pixel clock so it divides evenly.Please see above.quoted
Looking at NXP's kernel, I also noticed that their esc_prescaler is based on the byte clock divided by 20MHz. With some small code changes to get the PLL based on the desired pixel clock instead of hard-coded, I was able to set samsung,burst-clock-frequency = <1500000000>;This is not correct since the burst-clock-freq. specifies the hs-clock for the data lanes (see above).But I don't think the clock should be fixed. I think it should vary as the resolution changes. From what I can tell, NXP's DSI code doesn't hard code this value, but it does appear to cap it at 1.5G. I did soom looking into the NXP frequency calculation and it is capable of adjusting resolutions to some extent and from what I can see the 891MHz clock is only set when 1080p. At 720p, thier kernel shows the output frequency at 445.5 MHz. The way the DSIM is currently configured, it's fixed at 891MHz, so I don't expect the output feeding the adv7535 to be correct for the different resolutions.quoted
quoted
samsung,esc-clock-frequency = <20000000>;This is correct, we also use a esc-clock of 20MHz.quoted
With these settings and the above mentioned code changes, 1080p still appears, however when attempting other modes, the display still fails to load. I also noticed that the phy ref clock is set to 27MHz instead of NXP's 12MHz.That's interesting, I didn't noticed that NXP uses 12 MHz as refclock but I don't think that this is the problem. Since we have other converter chips using the bridge driver and they work fine. I still think that the main problem is within the ADV driver.Do the other converter chips work fine at different resolutions?quoted
quoted
I attempted to play with that setting, but I couldn't get 1080p to work again, so I backed it out. Maybe I am headed in the wrong direction, but I'm going to examine the P/M/S calculation of the timing on NXP's kernel to see how the DSIM in this code compares.I think the pms values are fine.I compared the P/M/S values between this driver and NXP's and they calculate different values of PMS when running at 1080P. NXP @ 1080p: fout = 891000, fin = 12000, m = 297, p = 2, s = 1, best_delta = 0 This kernel @ 1080p: PLL freq 891000000, (p 3, m 99, s 0) at 720P, the NXP Kernel fout = 445500, fin = 12000, m = 297, p = 2, s = 2, best_delta = 0 (working) at 720P, this kernel: PLL freq 891000000, (p 3, m 99, s 0) hs_clk = 891000000, byte_clk = 111375000, esc_clk = 18562500 (not working)quoted
quoted
If someone who understands the interactions between these different components has suggestions, I'm willing to run some experiments.Did managed to get access to the ADV7535 programming guide? This is the black box here. Let me check if I can provide you a link with our repo so you can test our current DSIM state if you want.I do have access to the programming guide, but it's under NDA, but I'll try to answer questions if I can.
Not meaning to butt in, but I have datasheets for ADV7533 and 7535 from previously looking at these chips. Mine fairly plainly states: "The DSI receiver input supports DSI video mode operation only, and specifically, only supports nonburst mode with sync pulses". Non-burst mode meaning that the DSI pixel rate MUST be the same as the HDMI pixel rate. Section 6.1.1 "DSI Input Modes" of adv7533_hardware_user_s_guide is even more explicit about the requirement of DSI timing matching The NXP kernel switching down to an hs_clk of 445.5MHz would therefore be correct for 720p operation. If you do program the manual DSI divider register to allow a DSI pixel rate of 148.5MHz vs HDMI pixel rate of 74.25MHz, you'd be relying on the ADV753x having at least a half-line FIFO between DSI rx and HDMI tx to compensate for the differing data rates. I see no reference to such, and I'd be surprised if it was more than a half dozen pixels to compensate for the jitter in the cases where the internal timing generator is mandatory due to fractional bytes. Dave
adamquoted
Regards, Marco
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel