Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 3 authors, 2022-07-24

Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] mm: Add PG_arch_3 page flag

From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-07-22 14:17:47
Also in: kvm, kvmarm

On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 02:50:29 +0100,
Peter Collingbourne [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
As with PG_arch_2, this flag is only allowed on 64-bit architectures due
to the shortage of bits available. It will be used by the arm64 MTE code
in subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <redacted>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
[catalin.marinas@arm.com: added flag preserving in __split_huge_page_tail()]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---
 fs/proc/page.c                 | 1 +
 include/linux/page-flags.h     | 1 +
 include/trace/events/mmflags.h | 7 ++++---
 mm/huge_memory.c               | 1 +
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/page.c b/fs/proc/page.c
index a2873a617ae8..438b8aa7249d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/page.c
+++ b/fs/proc/page.c
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(struct page *page)
 	u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ARCH,		PG_arch_1);
 #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 	u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ARCH_2,	PG_arch_2);
+	u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ARCH_2,	PG_arch_3);
Are PG_arch_2 and PG_arch_3 supposed to share the same user bit in
/proc/kpageflags? This seems odd.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help