Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] mm: Add PG_arch_3 page flag
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-07-22 14:17:47
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 02:50:29 +0100, Peter Collingbourne [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
As with PG_arch_2, this flag is only allowed on 64-bit architectures due to the shortage of bits available. It will be used by the arm64 MTE code in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <redacted> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> [catalin.marinas@arm.com: added flag preserving in __split_huge_page_tail()] Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> --- fs/proc/page.c | 1 + include/linux/page-flags.h | 1 + include/trace/events/mmflags.h | 7 ++++--- mm/huge_memory.c | 1 + 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/proc/page.c b/fs/proc/page.c index a2873a617ae8..438b8aa7249d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/page.c +++ b/fs/proc/page.c@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(struct page *page) u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ARCH, PG_arch_1); #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ARCH_2, PG_arch_2); + u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ARCH_2, PG_arch_3);
Are PG_arch_2 and PG_arch_3 supposed to share the same user bit in /proc/kpageflags? This seems odd. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel