Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64/sve: Don't zero non-FPSIMD register state on syscall by default
flat view
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-07-20 12:42:19
Also in:
kvmarm
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:20:23AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 08:35:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 06:35:37PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
The sysctl is disabled by default since it is anticipated that the risk of disruption to userspace is low. As well as being within the documented ABI this new behaviour mirrors the standard function call ABI for SVE in the AAPCS which should mean that compiler generated code is unlikely to rely on the current behaviour, the main risk is from hand coded assembly which directly invokes syscalls. The new behaviour is also what is currently implemented by qemu user mode emulation.
quoted
quoted
IIRC both Will and Mark R commented in the past that they'd like the current de-facto ABI to become the official one. I'll let them comment.
quoted
That would be good. I've not heard anything from Will either directly or indirectly. Mark R has indicated privately directly to me that he originally pushed for the currently implemented behaviour and prefers it. Marc Zyngier has previously noted publicly the current behaviour being a consideration in the context of discusion of optimisation ideas like this one, I was a bit surprised that he commented on an earlier patch in the series but not this one. You have previously pushed back on an attempt to document the current ABI, that was the main motivation for writing this patch.
I remember discussing this somewhere at some point with somebody, but that's not a tonne of use!
My opinion is that the observable behaviour is what matters. So if we documented that the register state is "undefined" but it is in fact always zero, then we should fix the documentation.
It's always zero with Linux, never zeroed by qemu user.
Does that help?
Yes, that's clear thanks though it does differ from what Catalin has said about keeping the flexibility in the documentation - Catalin?