On 27/07/2022 09:09, Jagan Teki wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 12:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 27/07/2022 08:52, Jagan Teki wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 19:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 26/07/2022 15:44, Jagan Teki wrote:

quoted

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 02:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 23/07/2022 22:43, Jagan Teki wrote:

quoted

Add power-domain header for RV1126 SoC from description in TRM.

Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
---
 include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f15930ff06f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */

Dual license and a blank line,  please.

Yes, all rockchip power includes (at least here) are GPL-2.0 what is
the issue with it?

The headers are part of bindings and all bindings should be dual
licensed, so they can be used in other projects.

Of course if copyright holder does not agree to release it on BSD, then
it would be fine as exception. Also would be fine from us not to accept
such bindings. :)

I don't hold anything here to use dual-licensing. The only thing I'm
wondering here is none of the rockchip power includes (which are
merged) are using dual-licensing they simply have GPL-2.0 which is
used in BSP.  Let me know what you suggest?

Hm, I think you asked this above and I answered that dual license should
be used. Maybe we misunderstand each other?

Sorry, I'm asking again as I'm liable to change the license here or not.

quoted

Do you include in this header any work which cannot be licensed on BSD
(e.g. is derivative of existing GPL-2 work)?

Yes, it is from BSP
https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-4.19/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h

Eh... if you don't have permission to relicense it and you copied the
IDs (although one would say it is not really copyrightable work), then
let it be GPL-2.0. In the future just write the IDs by yourself (not as
derivative work) and dual-license the header.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel