Re: [PATCH] scripts: dtc: fix a false alarm for node_name_chars_strict
From: qun-wei.lin <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-01 14:14:46
Also in:
linux-mediatek
On Tue, 2022-05-31 at 08:06 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:34 AM Qun-Wei Lin < qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com> wrote:quoted
The function check_node_name_chars_strict issues a false alarm when compiling an overlay dts. /fragment@0/__overlay__: Character '_' not recommended in node name This workaround will fix it by skip checking for node named __overlay__. Signed-off-by: Qun-Wei Lin <redacted> --- scripts/dtc/checks.c | 5 +++++We don't take patches for dtc. You must send them to upstream dtc and then it will be sync'ed to the kernel tree.
Ok, I'll send this patch to the correct upstream.
quoted
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)diff --git a/scripts/dtc/checks.c b/scripts/dtc/checks.c index 781ba1129a8e..6ef4f2cd67b9 100644 --- a/scripts/dtc/checks.c +++ b/scripts/dtc/checks.c@@ -325,6 +325,11 @@ static voidcheck_node_name_chars_strict(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, { int n = strspn(node->name, c->data); + if (streq(node->name, "__overlay__")) { + /* HACK: Overlay fragments are a special case */Not a hack IMO. However, this should be checking for any node name starting with '__'.
Did you mean it needs to skip the check for all nodes whose names start with "_", such as __overlay__, __fixup__, __local_fixup__, and __symbols__?
Also, doesn't 'fragment@0' cause a warning about missing 'reg'?
No, it doesn't. Actually, the check_unit_address_vs_reg function suppress the common warnings about the fragment names [1]. [1] https://github.com/dgibson/dtc/commit/afbddcd418fbf70467419b91f73cce972482449c _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel