Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 2 authors, 2022-06-08

Re: [PATCH] random: do not use jump labels before they are initialized

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: 2022-06-07 11:35:32
Also in: lkml

Hi Ard,

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Fair enough. What I would like is to remove the need to play around
with the placement of jump_label_init() across architectures. Jump
labels are fundamentally a performance optimization, so unless you can
explain how setting it as early as possible makes a material
difference, performance or otherwise, I really think we should pursue
a solution that does the static key manipulation at some later time.
Alright. It sounds like Catalin also prefers the same. This seems simple
enough with minimal downsides: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220607113238.769088-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/ (local)

So maybe we should just go that route.

Jason

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help