From: QintaoShen <redacted>
[ Upstream commit ba56291e297d28aa6eb82c5c1964fae2d7594746 ]
The allocation funciton devm_kcalloc may fail and return a null pointer,
which would cause a null-pointer dereference later.
It might be better to check it and directly return -ENOMEM just like the
usage of devm_kcalloc in previous code.
Signed-off-by: QintaoShen <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1648107843-29077-1-git-send-email-unSimple1993@163.com (local)
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c
index 8afb3f45d263..a33ec7eaf23d 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/ti_sci_pm_domains.c
@@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ static int ti_sci_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
devm_kcalloc(dev, max_id + 1,
sizeof(*pd_provider->data.domains),
GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pd_provider->data.domains)
+ return -ENOMEM;
pd_provider->data.num_domains = max_id + 1;
pd_provider->data.xlate = ti_sci_pd_xlate;
--
2.35.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel