Re: [PATCH] amba: fix refcount underflow if amba_device_add() fails
From: Kefeng Wang <hidden>
Date: 2022-05-24 03:15:55
Also in:
lkml
On 2022/5/24 11:09, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:51:39AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:quoted
"ARM: 9192/1: amba: fix memory leak in amba_device_try_add()" leads to a refcount underflow if amba_device_add() fails, which called by of_amba_device_create(), the of_amba_device_create() already exists the error handling, so amba_put_device() only need to be added into amba_deferred_retry(). Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <redacted>Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Thanks. PS: I also test with kmemleak, this could also fix previous memory leak issue.
Thanks, Guenterquoted
--- drivers/amba/bus.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c index 0e3ed5eb367b..0cb20324da16 100644 --- a/drivers/amba/bus.c +++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c@@ -493,13 +493,8 @@ static int amba_device_try_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent) goto skip_probe; ret = amba_read_periphid(dev); - if (ret) { - if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { - amba_device_put(dev); - goto err_out; - } + if (ret) goto err_release; - } skip_probe: ret = device_add(&dev->dev);@@ -546,6 +541,7 @@ static int amba_deferred_retry(void) continue; list_del_init(&ddev->node); + amba_device_put(ddev->dev); kfree(ddev); }-- 2.35.3.
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel