Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] dt-bindings: net: Add documentation for optional regulators
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2022-05-19 11:33:58
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-sunxi, lkml, netdev
On 19/05/2022 13:31, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:55:28AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
On 18/05/2022 22:09, Corentin Labbe wrote:quoted
quoted
+ regulators: + description: + List of phandle to regulators needed for the PHYquoted
I don't understand that... is your PHY defining the regulators or using supplies? If it needs a regulator (as a supply), you need to document supplies, using existing bindings.They're trying to have a generic driver which works with any random PHY so the binding has no idea what supplies it might need.
OK, that makes sense, but then question is why not using existing naming, so "supplies" and "supply-names"? Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel