On 15/05/2022 08:41, Anand Moon wrote:
Reorder the tmu_gpu clock initialization for exynos5422 SoC.
Why?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <redacted>
---
v1: split the changes and improve the commit messages
---
drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 43 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index 75b3afadb5be..1ef90dc52c08 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -1044,42 +1044,41 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
ret = PTR_ERR(data->clk);
goto err_sensor;
- }
-
- data->clk_sec = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "tmu_triminfo_apbif");
- if (IS_ERR(data->clk_sec)) {
- if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get triminfo clock\n");
- ret = PTR_ERR(data->clk_sec);
- goto err_sensor;
- }
} else {
- ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk_sec);
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk);
This looks a bit odd. The clock was before taken unconditionally, not
within "else" branch...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel