Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/7] bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2022-05-13 15:01:31
Also in:
bpf, linux-kselftest, lkml, netdev
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:40:25AM -0400, Xu Kuohai wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64, so bpf trampoline code can use it to replace nop with jump, or replace jump with nop. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <redacted> Acked-by: Song Liu <redacted> --- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 8ab4035dea27..3f9bdfec54c4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include <linux/bitfield.h> #include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <linux/memory.h> #include <linux/filter.h> #include <linux/printk.h> #include <linux/slab.h>@@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ #include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/debug-monitors.h> #include <asm/insn.h> +#include <asm/patching.h> #include <asm/set_memory.h> #include "bpf_jit.h"@@ -1529,3 +1531,64 @@ void bpf_jit_free_exec(void *addr) { return vfree(addr); } + +static int gen_branch_or_nop(enum aarch64_insn_branch_type type, void *ip, + void *addr, u32 *insn) +{ + if (!addr) + *insn = aarch64_insn_gen_nop(); + else + *insn = aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm((unsigned long)ip, + (unsigned long)addr, + type); + + return *insn != AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT ? 0 : -EFAULT; +} + +int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type poke_type, + void *old_addr, void *new_addr) +{ + int ret; + u32 old_insn; + u32 new_insn; + u32 replaced; + enum aarch64_insn_branch_type branch_type; + + if (!is_bpf_text_address((long)ip)) + /* Only poking bpf text is supported. Since kernel function + * entry is set up by ftrace, we reply on ftrace to poke kernel + * functions. For kernel funcitons, bpf_arch_text_poke() is only + * called after a failed poke with ftrace. In this case, there + * is probably something wrong with fentry, so there is nothing + * we can do here. See register_fentry, unregister_fentry and + * modify_fentry for details. + */ + return -EINVAL;
If you rely on ftrace to poke functions, why do you need to patch text at all? Why does the rest of this function exist? I really don't like having another piece of code outside of ftrace patching the ftrace patch-site; this needs a much better explanation.
+
+ if (poke_type == BPF_MOD_CALL)
+ branch_type = AARCH64_INSN_BRANCH_LINK;
+ else
+ branch_type = AARCH64_INSN_BRANCH_NOLINK;
+
+ if (gen_branch_or_nop(branch_type, ip, old_addr, &old_insn) < 0)
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (gen_branch_or_nop(branch_type, ip, new_addr, &new_insn) < 0)
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
+ if (aarch64_insn_read(ip, &replaced)) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (replaced != old_insn) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ ret = aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync((void *)ip, new_insn);... and where does the actual synchronization come from in this case? Thanks, Mark.
+out: + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); + return ret; +} -- 2.30.2
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel