[PATCH 01/15] dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner,sun4i-a10: include generic pwm schema · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 02/15] dt-bindings: pwm: imx: include generic pwm schema · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 04/15] dt-bindings: pwm: iqs620a: include generic pwm schema · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 08/15] dt-bindings: pwm: renesas,pwm: include generic pwm schema · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 09/15] dt-bindings: pwm: toshiba,visconti: include generic pwm schema · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
RE: [PATCH 09/15] dt-bindings: pwm: toshiba,visconti: include generic pwm schema · <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 03/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel,lgm: include generic pwm schema · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 05/15] dt-bindings: pwm: mxs: include generic pwm schema · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 10/15] dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: do not require pwm-cells · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
Re: [PATCH 10/15] dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: do not require pwm-cells · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 06/15] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: include generic pwm schema · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
Re: [PATCH 06/15] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: include generic pwm schema · Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 07/15] dt-bindings: pwm: sifive: include generic pwm schema · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
Re: [PATCH 07/15] dt-bindings: pwm: sifive: include generic pwm schema · Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> · 2022-03-11
[PATCH 13/15] dt-bindings: pwm: tiecap: do not require pwm-cells · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: do not require pwm-cells · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
RE: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: do not require pwm-cells · Ayyathurai, Vijayakannan <hidden> · 2022-02-14
Re: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel, keembay: do not require pwm-cells · Uwe Kleine-König <hidden> · 2022-02-14
Re: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel, keembay: do not require pwm-cells · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 12/15] dt-bindings: pwm: samsung: do not require pwm-cells · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: pwm: tiehrpwm: do not require pwm-cells · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
[PATCH 15/15] dt-bindings: pwm: renesas,tpu: do not require pwm-cells · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2022-02-14
Re: [PATCH 01/15] dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner,sun4i-a10: include generic pwm schema · Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> · 2022-02-14

Re: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel, keembay: do not require pwm-cells

From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2022-02-14 18:29:07
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-pwm, linux-riscv, linux-rockchip, linux-sunxi, lkml

Hello Krzysztof,

when I read the subject line I thought the patch intention to be wrong.
Maybe make that:

	dt-bindings: intel,keembay-pwm: Don't require #pwm-cells twice

?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help