On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:00:56PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 09:38:37AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:57:09PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 03:35:35PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

quoted

Note that PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is `def bool y`, so this will default to
enabled.

It should probably be "def_bool y if HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE"...

Sure; I'm more than happy to fold that into patch 5.

For the moment I've made that:

	def_bool y if HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL

... since that fit more neatly with the other bits I had to add, and didn't
change the existing behaviour of 32-bit x86.

Please shout if you think that should be HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE specifically!

I seem to remember peterz didn't mind keeping it default y as long as
HAVE_STATIC_CALL*. So I guess that's fine.

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel