Hi,

The simple patchset tries to enable kfunc call for arm64. Patch #1 just
overrides bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call() to enable kfunc call, patch #2
unexports the subtests in ksyms_module.c to fix the confusion in test
output and patch #3 add a test in ksyms_module.c to ensure s32 is
sufficient for kfunc offset.

Change Log:
v3:
  * patch #2: newly-addded to unexport unnecessary subtests
  * patch #3: use kallsyms_find() instead of reimplementing it.
  * patch #3: ensure kfunc call is supported before checking
              whether s32 will be overflowed or not.

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220127071532.384888-1-houtao1@huawei.com/ (local)
  * add a test to check whether imm will be overflowed for kfunc call

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220119144942.305568-1-houtao1@huawei.com (local)

Hou Tao (3):
  bpf, arm64: enable kfunc call
  selftests/bpf: do not export subtest as standalone test
  selftests/bpf: check whether s32 is sufficient for kfunc offset

 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                 |  5 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c   | 46 ++++++++++++++++++-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_frags.c         |  6 ---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c          |  4 +-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_cpumap_attach.c        |  4 +-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c        |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel