Re: [PATCH 2/7] pinctrl: mediatek: paris: Fix PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE readback
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Date: 2022-01-19 05:57:39
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 9:42 AM Guodong Liu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message----- From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> To: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij < linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Matthias Brugger [off-list ref] Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhiyong Tao [off-list ref], Guodong Liu < guodong.liu@mediatek.com> Subject: [PATCH 2/7] pinctrl: mediatek: paris: Fix PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE readback Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:22:39 +0800 When reading back pin bias settings, if the pin is not in a bias-disabled state, the function should return -EINVAL. Fix this in the mediatek-paris pinctrl library so that the read back state is not littered with bogus a "input bias disabled" combined with "pull up" or "pull down" states. Fixes: 805250982bb5 ("pinctrl: mediatek: add pinctrl-paris that implements the vendor dt-bindings") Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> --- drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.cb/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c index f9f9110f2107..1ca598ea7ba7 100644--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c@@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev*pctldev, if (err) goto out; if (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE) { - if (ret == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00) - ret = MTK_DISABLE; + if (ret != MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00) + err = -EINVAL; Hi Chen-Yu When tht API "hw->soc->bias_get_combo(hw, desc, &pullup, &ret)" is called, The ret vaule of may be MTK_DISABLE OR MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00 or (pullen == 0), All those cases are expected to be as "bias-disable". We advices to keep original code, + if (ret == MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00) + ret = MTK_DISABLE; + if (ret != MTK_DISABLE) + err = -EINVAL;
IIUC you are suggesting to assign MTK_DISABLE to ret in the other two cases, and then check if ret == MTK_DISABLE. Thanks for pointing that out. ChenYu
Thanks
} else if (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP) {
/* When desire to get pull-up value,
return
* error if current setting is pull-
down_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel