Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: Capture VM start
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-10 23:24:01
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, lkml
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 5:06 PM Sean Christopherson [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:quoted
Capture the start of the KVM VM, which is basically thePlease wrap at ~75 chars.quoted
start of any vCPU run. This state of the VM is helpful in the upcoming patches to prevent user-space from configuring certain VM features after the VM has started running.Please provide context of how the flag will be used. I glanced at the future patches, and knowing very little about arm, I was unable to glean useful info about exactly who is being prevented from doing what.quoted
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <redacted> --- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h index c310648cc8f1..d0bd8f7a026c 100644 --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h@@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ struct kvm { struct notifier_block pm_notifier; #endif char stats_id[KVM_STATS_NAME_SIZE]; + bool vm_started; }; #define kvm_err(fmt, ...) \@@ -1666,6 +1667,8 @@ static inline bool kvm_check_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } } +#define kvm_vm_has_started(kvm) (kvm->vm_started)Needs parantheses around (kvm), but why bother with a macro? This is the same header that defines struct kvm.
No specific reason for creating a macro as such. I can remove it if it feels noisy.
quoted
+ extern bool kvm_rebooting; extern unsigned int halt_poll_ns;diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 72c4e6b39389..962b91ac2064 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c@@ -3686,6 +3686,7 @@ static long kvm_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, int r; struct kvm_fpu *fpu = NULL; struct kvm_sregs *kvm_sregs = NULL; + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;If you're going to bother grabbing kvm, replace the instances below that also do vcpu->kvm.quoted
if (vcpu->kvm->mm != current->mm || vcpu->kvm->vm_dead) return -EIO;@@ -3723,6 +3724,14 @@ static long kvm_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, if (oldpid) synchronize_rcu(); put_pid(oldpid); + + /* + * Since we land here even on the first vCPU run, + * we can mark that the VM has started running.Please avoid "we", "us", etc.. "vm_started" is also ambiguous. If we end up with a flag, then I would prefer a much more literal name, a la created_vcpus, e.g. ran_vcpus or something.quoted
+ */ + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);This adds unnecessary lock contention when running vCPUs. The naive solution would be: if (!kvm->vm_started) { ... }
Not sure if I understood the solution..
quoted
+ kvm->vm_started = true; + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);Lastly, why is this in generic KVM?
The v1 of the series originally had it in the arm specific code. However, I was suggested to move it to the generic code since the book keeping is not arch specific and could be helpful to others too [1]. Thanks for the review. I'll add your other comments as well. Regards, Raghavendra [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/YYMKphExkqttn2w0@google.com/ (local)
quoted
} r = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(vcpu); trace_kvm_userspace_exit(vcpu->run->exit_reason, r); -- 2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel