Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8m: define proper status for caam jr
From: Michael Walle <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-07 12:05:09
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-devicetree, lkml, op-tee
From: Michael Walle <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-07 12:05:09
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-devicetree, lkml, op-tee
Am 2022-01-07 12:58, schrieb Lucas Stach:
Am Freitag, dem 07.01.2022 um 12:47 +0100 schrieb Michael Walle:quoted
Hi Rouven, Am 2022-01-07 10:46, schrieb Rouven Czerwinski:quoted
.. since AFAIK i.MX8M* can not be run without TF-A.Are you sure? There probably aren't any boards out there without TF-A, but why shouldn't it work without it?PSCI, i.e. the only means to start the secondary CPUs, is implemented in TF-A, so it's very unlikely that anyone would want to run a system without TF-A. Also quite a bit of the lowlevel SoC initialization is implemented in TF-A.
Doesn't mean u-boot cannot implement PSCI; actually you doesn't need it at all, you can still use spin tables. I just keep hearing the same arguments for the LS1028A SoC and yet there is one board without TF-A ;) Anyway, I admit it's rather unlikely. -michael _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel