On 30/12/2021 02:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:29 AM Matthias Brugger
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 20/12/2021 17:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:42 AM Matthias Brugger [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Please take a look on the below patches for aarch64 based MediaTek boards.
In this round we add support for the mt8183 based Acer Crhomebook 314, as well
as we add support to several SKUs for mt8183 based Chromebooks.
Apart from that we add basic support to the mt7986 in both variants (mt7986a,
mt7986b). The difference between the both SoCs are the pin-controller capabilities.

Hope you are fine with this pull request.

I've pulled both tags, but I have two minor comments:

- please put "mediatek" into the subject, that helps when looking at
the pull requests
    with pwclient, which does not show the author by default

I did this pull request with a lot of time pressure and forgot about it. My
apologies, I'll try to not forget next time.

quoted

- I was expecting you to send a branch for the new EN7523 SoC as well. Did that
    end up not making it in time?

As I have seen, in the meantime you reviewed some parts yourself. I took the
first two patches in my tree, but we should coordinate for the rest. If  you
want to take it through the SOC tree or if I should take it through the mediatek
tree. As Airoha is a subsidiary of MediaTek, I suppose in the long run, you want
it do be part of the Mediatek tree, correct?

I talked to Felix about it last week, I think it would be best if you handle the
arch/{arm,arm64}/ bits for Airoha as part of the mach-mediatek and merge
changes the same way as the mt76xx, mt69xx and mt81xx series. For the
initial submission, of en7623, having a single branch that contains both
the arch/* and drivers/* with the appropriate Acks would make the most
sense, to avoid spreading it out over multiple merge windows, though it's
not too late for 5.17.

Sounds good. Although it's still not clear to me, if you want to take the 
initial submission or if I should take that.

And I understand that it's a typo and we are too late for 5.17 given that we are 
in v5.16-rc7 already. Anyway I had some comments on the arm bits and we are 
still lacking the Acked-by for the clock driver.

Regards,
Matthias

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel