Re: [PATCH 3/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add regulator support
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: 2021-12-22 13:28:35
Also in:
linux-rockchip
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: 2021-12-22 13:28:35
Also in:
linux-rockchip
On 2021-12-22 13:00, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:54:06PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:quoted
Certainly RK3399 (and I guess RK3288 too) suffers from the same priority-inversion issue of being unaware that VD_GPU needs power before PD_GPU can be successfully turned on to probe the GPU to claim and enable the regulator (via "mali-supply" for DVFS purposes) that needed to be on in the first place. Currently all the boards are bodging around this with "regulator-always-on" (e.g. commit 06b2818678d9).Does the SoC actually support the supply being completely off in operation? A lot of devices want everything powered even if idle during full operation since keeping voltage differentials smaller makes it a lot easier to design to avoid leakage current type issues at the points where the different power domains connect.
I don't know TBH - the available documentation doesn't seem to go into quite that much detail. Robin. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel