Re: About resctrl code rebase

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 07:58:28AM +0000, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:

Hi James
 

quoted

quoted

On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:

quoted

quoted

As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
cache control function into resctrl.

quoted

quoted

Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.
ti
p-bot2@tip-bot2/

I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.

I've also posted the next series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.co
m
/

and there are a couple more after that.

When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after this?

quoted

quoted

quoted

I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
And where is the rebase code?
In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?

I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the
earlier part is reviewed.
(please help!)

I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I
hope that will happen this month.

Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code?
Is there anything I can do for you?

I look forward to hearing from you.

There's a branch published here[1].

Rob

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/log/?h=mpam/snapshot/v5.15

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel