Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: PMU updates
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: 2021-12-14 19:03:05
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On 2021-12-14 18:33, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:16:12 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:quoted
Here's v2, with the DSU binding actually finished (oh the shame...) and the NVIDIA PMU patch pulled in to benefit from the cleanup and keep things manageably together. The initial binding patch from v1 is no longer included since Rob has picked it up separately. Refactoring arm_pmu's probing to be more modular turns out to be a substantial yak to shave, so in the end I decided it *is* worth implementing Mark's macro suggestion now - after all, it can simply be converted from a function template to a structure template as and when the time comes. [...]Applied first three to will (for-next/perf-cpu), thanks! [1/5] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs https://git.kernel.org/will/c/d4c4844a9b47 [2/5] arm64: perf: Simplify registration boilerplate https://git.kernel.org/will/c/6ac9f30bd43b [3/5] arm64: perf: Support new DT compatibles https://git.kernel.org/will/c/893c34b60a59
Thanks Will! Just to clarify, are you leaving the DSU binding patches for Rob to pick up, or waiting for the typo to get fixed? (and if the former - Rob, would you like me to resend a v3 with the typo fixed?) Cheers, Robin. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel