Re: [PATCH 10/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3568-evb: Enable VOP2 and hdmi
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2021-12-02 15:35:06
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-rockchip
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 09:19:38AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 8:34 AM Sascha Hauer [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This enabled the VOP2 display controller along with hdmi and the required port routes which is enough to get a picture out of the hdmi port of the board. Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> --- .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-evb1-v10.dts | 24 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-evb1-v10.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-evb1-v10.dts index 184e2aa2416af..156e001492173 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-evb1-v10.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-evb1-v10.dts@@ -106,6 +106,12 @@ &gmac1m1_rgmii_clk status = "okay"; }; +&hdmi { + status = "okay"; + avdd-0v9-supply = <&vdda0v9_image>; + avdd-1v8-supply = <&vcca1v8_image>; +}; + &i2c0 { status = "okay";@@ -390,3 +396,21 @@ &sdmmc0 { &uart2 { status = "okay"; }; + +&vop { + status = "okay"; + assigned-clocks = <&cru DCLK_VOP0>, <&cru DCLK_VOP1>; + assigned-clock-parents = <&pmucru PLL_HPLL>, <&cru PLL_VPLL>; +}; + +&vop_mmu { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&hdmi_in_vp0 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&vp0_out_hdmi { + status = "okay"; +};You can accomplish the same thing already with: &vp0_out_hdmi { remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_in_vp0>; };
My idea was to describe all possible connections in the dtsi file and let the board dts writer only en/disable the needed connections. When the connections are specified in the dts file then writing it is more difficult and error prone.
or:
&vp0_out_hdmi {
/delete-property/ remote-endpoint;
};With this I have to change all connections that I don't need. With status = "okay" I have to change all connections that I actually do need, which will be much easier to read and write. I'll stick to the status = "okay" method for the next round, maybe I can still convince you ;) If it's the 'status' property you don't like being used when it's not a device that is enabled/disabled, then every other name would be fine with me as well. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel