On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 05:54:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted
The platform_get_irq_optional() is going to be changed in a way
that the result of it:
= 0 means no IRQ is provided
< 0 means the error which needs to be propagated to the upper layers
> 0 valid vIRQ is allocated
What about 0 being a valid irq?
For this driver it can't be possible. The driver is instantiated via DT only
and OF APIs never return 0 for IRQ. If it's the case, it's a regression in the
OF APIs.
I can elaborate in the commit message.
quoted
In this case, drop check for 0. Note, the 0 is not valid vIRQ and
platform_get_irq_optional() issues a big WARN() in such case,
But it still is a valid irq, so why did you just break things? Yes, a
warning will happen, but the driver and platform will still work.
In general yes, but not in this case. See above.
...
quoted
- if (irq >= 0)
+ if (irq > 0)
disable_irq_wake(irq);
Why change this now? What does this solve at this point in time?
As explained in the commit message, it's a preparation patch to fix the logic
behind platform_get_irq_optional().
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel