Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] Documentation: document uaccess logging

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:46 PM Dmitry Vyukov [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 06:17, Peter Collingbourne [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add documentation for the uaccess logging feature.

Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Ia626c0ca91bc0a3d8067d7f28406aa40693b65a2
Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <redacted>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst           |   1 +
 Documentation/admin-guide/uaccess-logging.rst | 149 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/uaccess-logging.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
index 1bedab498104..4f6ee447ab2f 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst

@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ ABI will be found here.
    :maxdepth: 1

    sysfs-rules
+   uaccess-logging

 The rest of this manual consists of various unordered guides on how to
 configure specific aspects of kernel behavior to your liking.

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/uaccess-logging.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/uaccess-logging.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4b2b297afc00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/uaccess-logging.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+===============
+Uaccess Logging
+===============
+
+Background
+----------
+
+Userspace tools such as sanitizers (ASan, MSan, HWASan) and tools
+making use of the ARM Memory Tagging Extension (MTE) need to
+monitor all memory accesses in a program so that they can detect
+memory errors. Furthermore, fuzzing tools such as syzkaller need to
+monitor all memory accesses so that they know which parts of memory
+to fuzz. For accesses made purely in userspace, this is achieved
+via compiler instrumentation, or for MTE, via direct hardware
+support. However, accesses made by the kernel on behalf of the user
+program via syscalls (i.e. uaccesses) are normally invisible to
+these tools.
+
+Traditionally, the sanitizers have handled this by interposing the libc
+syscall stubs with a wrapper that checks the memory based on what we
+believe the uaccesses will be. However, this creates a maintenance
+burden: each syscall must be annotated with its uaccesses in order
+to be recognized by the sanitizer, and these annotations must be
+continuously updated as the kernel changes.
+
+The kernel's uaccess logging feature provides userspace tools with
+the address and size of each userspace access, thereby allowing these
+tools to report memory errors involving these accesses without needing
+annotations for every syscall.
+
+By relying on the kernel's actual uaccesses, rather than a
+reimplementation of them, the userspace memory safety tools may
+play a dual role of verifying the validity of kernel accesses. Even
+a sanitizer whose syscall wrappers have complete knowledge of the
+kernel's intended API may vary from the kernel's actual uaccesses due
+to kernel bugs. A sanitizer with knowledge of the kernel's actual
+uaccesses may produce more accurate error reports that reveal such
+bugs. For example, a kernel that accesses more memory than expected
+by the userspace program could indicate that either userspace or the
+kernel has the wrong idea about which kernel functionality is being
+requested -- either way, there is a bug.
+
+Interface
+---------
+
+The feature may be used via the following prctl:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+  uint64_t addr = 0; /* Generally will be a TLS slot or equivalent */
+  prctl(PR_SET_UACCESS_DESCRIPTOR_ADDR_ADDR, &addr, 0, 0, 0);
+
+Supplying a non-zero address as the second argument to ``prctl``

Is it possible to unregister it? Is it what happens when 0 is passed
as addr? If so, please describe.
It may be handy to do one-off tracing with the address on stack.

Yes, done in v3.

quoted

+will cause the kernel to read an address (referred to as the *uaccess
+descriptor address*) from that address on each kernel entry.
+
+When entering the kernel with a non-zero uaccess descriptor address
+to handle a syscall, the kernel will read a data structure of type
+``struct uaccess_descriptor`` from the uaccess descriptor address,
+which is defined as follows:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+  struct uaccess_descriptor {
+    uint64_t addr, size;
+  };

Want to double check the extension story. If we ever want flags in
uaccess_descriptor, we can add a flag to prctl that would say that
address must point to uaccess_descriptor_v2 that contains flags,
right?
And similarly we can extend uaccess_buffer_entry, right?

Yes, we can specify a flag bit in e.g. the third argument to prctl,
which could switch us to using new struct definitions for the uaccess
descriptor and uaccess buffer entries.

quoted

+This data structure contains the address and size (in array elements)
+of a *uaccess buffer*, which is an array of data structures of type
+``struct uaccess_buffer_entry``. Before returning to userspace, the
+kernel will log information about uaccesses to sequential entries
+in the uaccess buffer. It will also store ``NULL`` to the uaccess
+descriptor address, and store the address and size of the unused
+portion of the uaccess buffer to the uaccess descriptor.
+
+The format of a uaccess buffer entry is defined as follows:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+  struct uaccess_buffer_entry {
+    uint64_t addr, size, flags;
+  };
+
+The meaning of ``addr`` and ``size`` should be obvious. On arm64,

I would say explicitly "addr and size contain address and size of the
user memory access".

Done in v3.

quoted

+tag bits are preserved in the ``addr`` field. There is currently
+one flag bit assignment for the ``flags`` field:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+  #define UACCESS_BUFFER_FLAG_WRITE 1
+
+This flag is set if the access was a write, or clear if it was a
+read. The meaning of all other flag bits is reserved.
+
+When entering the kernel with a non-zero uaccess descriptor
+address for a reason other than a syscall (for example, when
+IPI'd due to an incoming asynchronous signal), any signals other
+than ``SIGKILL`` and ``SIGSTOP`` are masked as if by calling
+``sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, set, NULL)`` where ``set`` has been
+initialized with ``sigfillset(set)``. This is to prevent incoming
+signals from interfering with uaccess logging.
+
+Example
+-------
+
+Here is an example of a code snippet that will enumerate the accesses
+performed by a ``uname(2)`` syscall:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+  struct uaccess_buffer_entry entries[64];
+  struct uaccess_descriptor desc;
+  uint64_t desc_addr = 0;
+  prctl(PR_SET_UACCESS_DESCRIPTOR_ADDR_ADDR, &desc_addr, 0, 0, 0);
+
+  desc.addr = (uint64_t)&entries;
+  desc.size = 64;
+  desc_addr = (uint64_t)&desc;

We don't need any additional compiler barriers here, right?
It seems that we only need to prevent re-ordering of these writes with
the next and previous syscalls, which the compiler should do already.

Right. From the compiler's perspective the address of desc_addr is
leaked at the prctl call site, so any external function call
(including syscalls) could read or write to it.

Peter

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel