On 08/12/2021 02:45, Ian Rogers wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/cpumap.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/cpumap.h
index 840d4032587b..1c1726f4a04e 100644
--- a/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/cpumap.h
+++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/cpumap.h
@@ -4,9 +4,16 @@
#include <linux/refcount.h>
+/**
+ * A sized, reference counted, sorted array of integers representing CPU
+ * numbers. This is commonly used to capture which CPUs a PMU is associated
+ * with.
+ */
struct perf_cpu_map {
refcount_t refcnt;
+ /** Length of the map array. */
int nr;
+ /** The CPU values. */
int map[];
would simply more distinct names for the variables help instead of or in addition to comments?
Generally developers don't always check comments where the struct is defined when the meaning could be judged intuitively
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel