Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2021-11-23

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 8/8] net: phylink: allow PCS to be removed

From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-11-23 12:10:16
Also in: linux-mediatek, netdev

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:00:50AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Allow phylink_set_pcs() to be called with a NULL pcs argument to remove
the PCS from phylink. This is only supported on non-legacy drivers
where doing so will have no effect on the mac_config() calling
behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
index a935655c39c0..9f0f0e0aad55 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
@@ -1196,15 +1196,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phylink_create);
  * in mac_prepare() or mac_config() methods if it is desired to dynamically
  * change the PCS.
  *
- * Please note that there are behavioural changes with the mac_config()
- * callback if a PCS is present (denoting a newer setup) so removing a PCS
- * is not supported, and if a PCS is going to be used, it must be registered
- * by calling phylink_set_pcs() at the latest in the first mac_config() call.
+ * Please note that for legacy phylink users, there are behavioural changes
+ * with the mac_config() callback if a PCS is present (denoting a newer setup)
+ * so removing a PCS is not supported. If a PCS is going to be used, it must
+ * be registered by calling phylink_set_pcs() at the latest in the first
+ * mac_config() call.
+ *
+ * For modern drivers, this may be called with a NULL pcs argument to
+ * disconnect the PCS from phylink.
  */
 void phylink_set_pcs(struct phylink *pl, struct phylink_pcs *pcs)
 {
+	if (pl->config->legacy_pre_march2020 && pl->pcs && !pcs) {
+		phylink_warn(pl,
+			     "Removing PCS is not supported in a legacy driver");
+		return;
+	}
+
 	pl->pcs = pcs;
-	pl->pcs_ops = pcs->ops;
+	pl->pcs_ops = pcs ? pcs->ops : NULL;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phylink_set_pcs);
 
-- 
2.30.2
I've read the discussion at
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cfcb368f-a785-9ea5-c446-1906eacd8c03@seco.com/ (local)
and I still am not sure that I understand what is the use case behind
removing a PCS?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help