Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 3 authors, 2021-12-03

Re: [PATCH v4 04/13] mtd: spi-nor: core: Introduce flash_info mfr_flags

From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-23 06:46:11

On 11/22/21 8:34 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe

Am 2021-11-22 10:50, schrieb Tudor Ambarus:
quoted
Used in the manufacturer fixup hooks to differentiate support
between flashes of the same manufacturer. Not used in the
SPI NOR core.

Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <redacted>
Nice!
Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <redacted>
quoted
@@ -58,28 +61,46 @@ static const struct spi_nor_fixups sst26vf_fixups =
{
 static const struct flash_info sst_parts[] = {
      /* SST -- large erase sizes are "overlays", "sectors" are 4K */
      { "sst25vf040b", INFO(0xbf258d, 0, 64 * 1024,  8,
-                           SECT_4K | SST_WRITE | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK |
SPI_NOR_SWP_IS_VOLATILE) },
+                           SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK |
+                           SPI_NOR_SWP_IS_VOLATILE)
+             MFR_FLAGS(SST_WRITE) },
Looks a bit odd, but I'm fine with that. Does checkpatch.pl complain,
though?
I've run checkpatch --strict for the series, no complaint for things introduced
by me. None here. Check patch 5/13 to see how all the flags will look like.

Thanks,
ta
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help