Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: watchdog: da9062: add watchdog timeout mode

On 11/30/21 8:11 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:

On Guenter Roeck wrote:

quoted

quoted

Document the watchdog timeout mode property. If this property is used
the user can select what happens on watchdog timeout. Set this property
to 1 to enable SHUTDOWN (the device resets), set it to 0 and the device
will go to POWERDOWN on watchdog timeout.

Signed-off-by: Andrej Picej <redacted>
---
   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/da9062-wdt.txt | 3 +++
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/da9062-wdt.txt

b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/da9062-wdt.txt

quoted

index 950e4fba8dbc..e3e6e56cee21 100644

--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/da9062-wdt.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/da9062-wdt.txt

@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ Optional properties:
   - dlg,use-sw-pm: Add this property to disable the watchdog during suspend.
   	Only use this option if you can't use the watchdog automatic suspend
   	function during a suspend (see register CONTROL_B).
+- dlg,wdt-sd: Set what happens on watchdog timeout. If this bit is set the
+	watchdog timeout triggers SHUTDOWN, if cleared the watchdog triggers
+	POWERDOWN. Can be 0 or 1.

Why does it need a value ? Why not just bool ?

One argument might be that if the property isn't provided then the OTP
configured value can persist without needing a FW change around this DT binding.

My belief though is that the majority of users would have this property set to 0
by default in OTP, so a boolean would be OK I think here to enable watchdog
shutdown.

Sorry, you lost me.
	dlg,wdt-sd = <0>;
is the current situation, and identical to not having the property in
the first place.
	dlg,wdt-sd = <1>;
is new. I don't see the difference to
	dlg,wdt-sd;
vs. not having the property at all (which is, again, the current situation).
Since it has to be backward compatible,
	dlg,wdt-sd = <0>;
will always be identical to not having the property at all.
I can not find a situation where an integer would have any benefits over a boolean.

Guenter

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel