On 22.11.2021 00:27, Sam Protsenko wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
/* Register Offset definitions for CMU_CORE (0x12000000) */
@@ -1014,24 +1060,12 @@ static int __init exynos850_cmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
const struct samsung_cmu_info *info;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
- struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
info = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
- exynos850_init_clocks(np, info->clk_regs, info->nr_clk_regs);
- samsung_cmu_register_one(np, info);
- /* Keep bus clock running, so it's possible to access CMU registers */
- if (info->clk_name) {
- struct clk *bus_clk;
-
- bus_clk = clk_get(dev, info->clk_name);
- if (IS_ERR(bus_clk)) {
- pr_err("%s: could not find bus clock %s; err = %ld\n",
- __func__, info->clk_name, PTR_ERR(bus_clk));
- } else {
- clk_prepare_enable(bus_clk);
- }
- }
+ /* Early clocks are already registered using CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER() */
+ if (info != &peri_cmu_info)
+ exynos850_register_cmu(dev, dev->of_node, info);
Do you still need this test? How about just removing "samsung,exynos850-cmu-peri"
from exynos850_cmu_of_match[] ?
--
Regards,
Sylwester
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel