Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-hw: Use new thermal pressure update function
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Date: 2021-11-16 08:29:05
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Date: 2021-11-16 08:29:05
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
Hi Thara, On 11/15/21 11:39 PM, Thara Gopinath wrote:
On 11/15/21 3:57 PM, Thara Gopinath wrote:quoted
On 11/9/21 2:57 PM, Lukasz Luba wrote:quoted
Thermal pressure provides a new API, which allows to use CPU frequency as an argument. That removes the need of local conversion to capacity. Use this new API and remove old local conversion code. The new arch_update_thermal_pressure() also accepts boost frequencies, which solves issue in the driver code with wrong reduced capacity calculation. The reduced capacity was calculated wrongly due to 'policy->cpuinfo.max_freq' used as a divider. The value present there was actually the boost frequency. Thus, even a normal maximum frequency value which corresponds to max CPU capacity (arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu_id)) is not able to remove the capping.Also I failed to mention that, currently freq_factor is initialized as cpuinfo.max_freq / 1000 which means again all the issues you mentioned below can be hit, if some cpufreq driver decides to set boost at init. I have sent a patch earlier today to fix this.
Yes, you are right.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20211115201010.68567-1-thara.gopinath@linaro.org/T/#u (local)
Looking at the change, it makes sense. I'll try to respond to that patch. Thank you for looking into this issue. Regards, Lukasz _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel