On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 12:22 AM Andreas Kemnade [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,
I finally found time to test this.
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 21:48:28 +1000
Alistair Francis [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
quoted
+ i2c {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ touchscreen@24 {
+ compatible = "cypress,tt2100";
+ reg = <0x24>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&tp_reset_ds203>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&pio>;
+ interrupts = <1 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
hmm, in the code is IRQ_TRIGGER_FALLING but here is LEVEL_LOW, hmm what
it is really?
The reMarkable uses IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING, but this example isn't
based on that. It' based on the original documentation from the patch
series.
quoted
+ reset-gpios = <&pio 7 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
hmm, if the reset gpio at the chip is active low (I guess it is) that
would indicate an inverter between SoC and gpio. So a nonstandard setup
as an example, probably not a good idea.
It seems to be common for the cypress,tt2100, as the original
documentation and the rM2 both do this. Does the Kobo not do this?
Alistair
Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel